New Bull$hit Detector
[caption id="" align="alignnone" width="230" caption="Click to start"][/caption]
this is the new ACS 2 Bullshit Detector. It has been run past the latest letters and seems to be VERY reliable at detecting bullshit. If you have any comments on how the new ACS 2 can be improved please let me know.
Labels: acs, acs law, ACS LAW Letters, andrew crossley, avanta, cramer pelmont, davenport lyons, digiprotect, media cat, p2p, piri, terence tsang, tilly bailey irvine
11 Comments:
Excellent new meter did you get it from carlsberg?
My only concern with the meter is that it needs the scale adjusting because it does done enough on the negative scale but really needs to go upto several thousand on the positive scale and I note that it keep bouncing off the scale. Of course my TBI letters would never have done that, lol
This is simply untrue Ms Mitten we only use the finest harvested IP addresses unlike you and your clearly fake IPs and you faked evidence. That's why you quit and I am still going strong your letters Ms Mitten go off the scale not mine, enough said OK,
I am deeply upset at the suggestions I have never been to court this is simply untrue, I have been to court, but sadly I lost so I now have 2 unsettled county court judgements against my company, but I believe I will have you slyckboys in court oh yes , oh yes I will
Andrew, I have to say I think that those slyckboys are right, I really do believe you are a complete W*!?*?r.
Terence now works for me hahahahaha, he is all mine, my precious, my precious
Your welcome to Terrence to be honest all he has done is get me into loads of trouble with the SRA just like he did with DL, I declare "I" have done nothing wrong and our evidence is fabricated, hmm I mean totally acurate.
Got my 1st letter from acs law about 2 months ago to which i emailed an LOD, jest received my 2nd letter with the following information: We refer to previous correspondence regarding infringement of clients copyright. We note that the response given matches a template on the internet... With this in mind we are disinclined to accept at face value what you have said as it's a generic response. The open offer of compromise made in the original letter is now withdrawn. we have instructions from our client to pursue this matter against you further. In absence of anything meaningful to consider from you, our clients stance will remain unaltered.
Wot the hell do I reply to that lol?
btw. the original offer has now doubled and they mention CPR36.10 (civil procedure rules)
I can offer some advice here, simply pay up it simple I need some extra cash to pay for my room service bill here in Cannes
Well PLEASE try NOT to worry, that would be the first thing to do. You have a choice, to respond and get another letter, or as you HAVE responded and their is NO FURTHER evidence, to leave it. I would however urge you to go to the Slyck Forums and check them out where a lively debate is ongoing! http://tinyurl.com/slyck
Incredibly great read. Truely.
Haha I am really the only comment to your amazing article?
Thanks to share these details it’s truly nice. IRIS Tax Attorney
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home