Thursday 20 May 2010

Which? vs ACS:LAW "The UNUSUAL suspects"

[caption id="attachment_276" align="alignnone" width="114" caption="Page 1"][/caption]

[caption id="attachment_277" align="alignnone" width="117" caption="Page 2"][/caption]

[caption id="attachment_278" align="alignnone" width="115" caption="Page 3"][/caption]

[caption id="attachment_279" align="alignnone" width="117" caption="Page 4"][/caption]

Which? computing in their latest Magazine have an article regarding the many falsely accused people who have been caught in the "Speculative Invoicing" plan by ACS:LAW.  Described in the Lords as "Legal Blackmail, the article exposing it further to the light is published here. (I would urge you all to actually BUY Which? as it is truly an EXCELLENT magazine)

I would like to say a big thankyou to Which? Computing AND to Deborah Prince the Legal affairs Chief

 "Fair Use is Claimed"

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

1 Comments:

Anonymous More Legal Shenanigans In Britain – Which? vs ACS:LAW “The UNUSUAL suspects” « Through the Looking Glass said...

[...] scam used by ACS:Law to attempt to collect large amounts of money from accused file sharers titled Which? vs ACS:Law “The Unusual Suspects”. ACS:BORE didn’t add any commentary, but the article in from Which? was detailed, describing [...]

20 May 2010 at 12:26  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home